Here is an attempt to overthrow “the people of the United States” in favor of a piracy and brigandage rooted in “socialism,” or “Marxism,” or “communism,” but for tactical reasons prefers to camouflage itself as “anti-racism.” In attempting to build a new sovereign majority, various Marxist groups have cobbled together a coalition of angry women, brainwashed youth, “disenfranchised” minorities and aliens. The problem of sovereignty in a divided popular state (such as our own) is one which we now confront for the Constitution of the United States is something alien to most of the persons who occupy the actual government formed under it, even as the government’s interests and ideas are at variance with “the people,” or what remains after various “victim” groups have seceded to form a “new people.”įor several decades a subversive minority has attempted to make itself into an unassailable sovereign majority - more recently by importing millions of non-white illegal aliens, smuggled across a border that is decried as “racist.” This would-be sovereign majority wishes to do away with the country’s national traditions, its national symbols, and even its national ideals. In America today there are two sovereign powers - two distinct notions of “we the people” - laying claim to words like “justice” and “freedom,” and “good government.” But each of these powers understands words differently and their differences are not negotiable, neither can there be a compromise between them.īodin warned that “it is easier to prevent an invasion than to expel the enemy once he has effected entry” and likewise “it is better to prevent sedition than to try and cure it.” And then he added, as if for our benefit: “This is even more difficult in a popular state than any other.” In response, CNN said, “Trump doubles down on divisive messaging” while CNBC claimed that Trump was stoking “national divisions.” He honored presidents Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and Roosevelt, vowing to defend this and other monuments against vandalism. And presently, however we might hope otherwise, there is no princely sovereign that can “resort to force to extinguish them … by punishment of the manifest leaders” because under our political system “the people” enjoy sovereignty, and the people themselves are divided into two hostile camps, each opposed to the other.īy way of example, President Donald Trump made a July 4 speech at Mount Rushmore. The sixteenth century political theorist, Jean Bodin, warned that, if factional differences cannot be resolved by a process of law, then the sovereign “ought to resort to force to extinguish them altogether, by punishment of the manifest leaders before they become so strong that there is no prevailing against them.”Īs of this writing, the United States of America is beset by factional differences that cannot be resolved by a process of law for the law itself has been subverted. They must therefore be prevented wherever possible by wise counsel … and every means should be taken to cure them….
![subversion city generator subversion city generator](https://media.cybernews.com/2020/08/Apple-Daily-HK.jpg)
WE put first as a general maxim that factions and parties are dangerous….